Friday 15 April 2011

Why I learned To Love Charlie Chaplin


It would be Charlie Chaplin's 122nd birthday today. When i was young they would show his films on the television along with Harold Lloyd and other silent films and i was never very impressed, Laurel and Hardy hitting each other with ladders or Abbot and Costello being chased by a werewolf were much funnier.
It wasn't until i got older and found out what Charlie Chaplin stood for that i watched his films in an admirable light.
To many Charlie Chaplin was a comedy actor but when you find out he was a Communist, you see his films as he intended them as well aimed shots against poverty and inequality. Ironic as it was that at at his height he was the second largest earner in America, $13,000 a week from the Mutual Film Corporation.
Once he got to write and produce his own films, the common theme was always the poor guy handing it to the wealthy and powerful. This slipped under the radar as possibly Communist, as did his friendship with William Z. Foster, who would go on to become general secretary of the Communist Party of the United States of America.
It wasn't until he gave a speech in San Francisco which he addressed the audience as comrades several times and his powerful speech from The Dictator where Chaplin raged against world governments was reprinted in leaflets by the Communist Party that the FBI began taking a closer look at the Chaplin file.
Joe McCarthy's Un-American Committee and the Immigration and Naturalization Service interviewed him about his Communist links and while he was on a ship travelling to England to promote a film, he received a telegram informing him that his re-entry visa had been rescinded due to 'being a member of the Communist Party, with grave moral charges and with making statements that would indicate a leering, sneering attitude toward a country whose hospitality has enriched him.'
When you know all this and hear the Great Dictator speech where he has lines such as: 'In this world there is room for everyone and the earth is rich and can provide for everyone' and 'Let us fight for a new world, a decent world that will give men a chance to work, that will give you the future and old age and security', you realise that far from just being that man with a Hitler moustache who fell over a lot, he was subliminally showing pro-Communist messages to millions of Americans in the most anti-Communist country in the World and got paid $13,000 a week to do it.
Got to love that and now, if you didn't know of Chaplin's Communist leanings, and you have stumbled across this post and have read it down to here, you can never watch a Chaplin film ever again without his pro-Communist messages hitting you squarely between the eyes at every turn. What a stinker.

9 comments:

David G said...

"...well aimed shots against poverty and equality." Lucy,should that be 'inequality'?

I don't see Chaplin as a 'stinker' at all. Anyone who highlights the gross inequality that exists because of the greed-driven capitalist system is a hero in my mind.

Mind you, I don't support capitalism or communism but something in between, something that ensures that most people enjoy benefits and security for their labour and the greedy are taxed out of existence.

Lucy said...

Yep, thank you, i missed out the 'in'. The stinker bit was sarcasm.

Anonymous said...

lucy,

i don't get why you would admire someone that would make a nation UK like Cuba or China.

q

Cheezy said...

Granted it’s been a few years since I read a lot about Chaplin, but I seem to remember that he actually wasn’t a communist... He was a freethinker, a non-conformist, a supporter of organised labour, and he had some very egalitarian impulses, but he was never a member of the Communist Party and (from memory) his autobiography contains much that was extremely critical of communism in the USSR.

The thing to remember about Chaplin is that he was born into absolutely desperate poverty, of the kind that doesn’t exist in the UK anymore. His early years were deeply affected by this, and by his mother going insane and being sent to an asylum (not the place to be in late 19th century London)... This experience informed his later beliefs.

Proponents of the “Chaplin as communist” view point out his communist ‘associates’. This is rubbish though. I associate with a lesbian. I associate with a Muslim. I associate with ginger pony-tailed chiropodist. Does this make me one too?

By the way, the FBI file on Chaplin also said he was Jewish. This seems to be mainly because his half- brother Sidney was half-Jewish (i.e. deemed to have had a Jewish father) i.e. the FBI file is a crock.

The most they’ve got is a stupid speech he made during the war praising Stalin (but it was during the war, a time when many otherwise sensible people were saying nice things about Uncle Joe)... also saying that he while he himself wasn’t a communist, he ‘felt pro-communist’. And throughout the rest of his life he would say that he ‘refused to fall into line’ by hating them. This pissed off the House Committee for UnAmerican Activities, but it doesn’t make him a communist.

By 1949 even J Edgar Hoover had to say: “there are no witnesses available who could offer testimony that Chaplin had been a member of the Communist Party in the past, is now a member, or that he has contributed funds to the Communist Party.”... And that remained the case until the rest of his life.

If he was a communist, then he was a more secretive one than Philby, Burgess, MacLean etc... i.e. it’s a highly dubious thing to conclude.

Anonymous said...

What a great speech. In McCarthy's time it was like Bushs you are either with us or against us. Chaplin refused to condemn them, even praised them, so he was always going to be outed as a Communist. Whether he actually was or not i don't know but he moved in some very Communist friendly circles even if he didn't pay a subscription fee.

Anonymous said...

i have friends that smoke, drink excessively, and use marijuna... but i don't do those things.

i do some things with felons and former felons but i'm not a felon...

btw, bush was speaking to nations... not individuals.

q

Cheezy said...

Darth Vader: "If you're not with me, then you're my enemy".

Obi Wan Kenobi: "Only a Sith deals in absolutes".

Bush wasn't the first leader to use the 'for us or against us' line, but it's always been a load of sh*t, whoever uses it. Every nation has a moral right to neutrality.

Anonymous said...

cheezy,

i agree. i think bush was saying that if you let the guys that we call terrorists reside in your nation and you don't help us or let us go after them then you ARE NOT NEUTrAL... not a traditional natin v nation war.

q

Cheezy said...

You should have been his speechwriter, Q, because if he'd said exactly that, nobody could possibly have had a problem with it. What he did say, however, was just added to the list of his idiotic/arrogant statements.